Applications in the Queensland Courts: a short guide

Applications in the Queensland Courts – a short guide

There are two types of applications:

  • An Originating Application (Form 5) is a document that commences certain types of court proceedings;
  • An Application in a proceeding (Form 9) is a document that is used for an application that is brought in court proceedings that have already commenced.

Originating Application versus Claim

The main difference between court proceedings commenced by claim and those commenced by originating application are that proceedings commenced by claim require pleadings. Pleadings are of use to the court when there are serious disputes of fact between the parties (pleadings narrow the issues of fact to be decided).

Originating Applications are rarer. Most commonly, Originating Applications are used for cases such as:

  • Applying for further provision from the estate of a deceased person under section 41(1) of the Succession Act 1981 (family provision)
  • Applications under the Corporations Act 2001 to wind up a company based on a failure to comply with a statutory demand, or to have a statutory demand set aside
  • Certain applications under the Property Law Act 2023 (e.g. for the possession of a property, for the appointment of trustees for the partition and sale of a property) and the Status of Children Act 1973.

You should use an Originating Application when the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (UCPR) or another Act require or allow a person to apply to the court for relief: (rules 10 and 11 UCPR).

You can (but don’t have to) use an Originating Application in cases where:

  • there are not going to be substantial disputes of fact; or
  • urgent relief is sought; or
  • there is not a respondent (rule 11), although this is very rare.

If you complete an Originating Application:

  • you will have to pay a court filing fee;
  • the court will set a hearing date;
  • in most cases you will need to serve the Respondent; and
  • the court can make an order requiring the parties to exchange pleadings, if it considers that these are required (rule 14).

Completing an application form

You can find the court forms are on the court’s website.

For an Originating Application use a Form 5, for an Interlocutory Application use a Form 9. The application forms ask you to give an estimate of the time it will take the Court to consider the event. For a contested application, with affidavit material and written submissions to read, as well as oral argument to hear, at least 45 minutes will usually be required.

Originating Application

For an Originating Application, the Applicant is the person seeking relief, the Respondent is the person you are seeking relief from. Note that for some rare Originating Applications, there will not be a Respondent because the order that you are asking the court to make is not against any other person.

  • For example:
John is seeking a declaration of paternity under section 10 of the Status of Children Act 1978 that Joseph Grande was the father of John’s deceased mother Mary. Joseph passed away in 1960. There is no Respondent to this Application.

When you write the orders that you are applying for always write the section of the Act or the rule that gives the court the power to make the orders that you are asking for. This is the section or rule that you are “relying on.”

  • For example:
That pursuant to section 38 of the Property Law Act 1974 John Smith Solicitor be appointed as trustee for the sale of the property at 100 John Road, East Brisbane, described as Lot 1 on RP 765 432 County of Stanley, Parish of Bulimba, Title Reference 1098 7654.

Interlocutory Application

For an Interlocutory Application in an existing proceeding, just use the parties’ descriptions in the existing proceedings (e.g. Plaintiff, Defendant, Third Defendant added by Counterclaim, etc).

When you write the orders that you are applying for always write the rule or the section of the Act that gives the court the power to make the orders that you are asking for. This is the rule or section that you are “relying on.”

  • For example:
That pursuant to rule 377(1)(a) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 the Plaintiff have leave to amend the Statement of Claim in accordance with exhibit A to the affidavit of Joe Bloggs filed 21 June 2013.

For an Interlocutory Application it is also worth considering:

  • Should the court set a time limit on when the Respondent must comply with the order?
  • What will happen in the event that the Respondent does not comply with the order?
    • If the order does not say what happens if it is not complied with, then you may need to make a further application to enforce the order or respond to the breach. Sometimes an order will say that if the Respondent does not comply then the Respondent’s case can come to an end; this will usually happen when the Respondent has previously been in breach of the rules.
  • If you have previously sent a Rule 444 letter and are bringing an application to progress your matter, do the orders that you are seeking match the relief you mention in your Rule 444 letter?

Costs

The general provision is that “costs follow the event.” This means that the successful party’s costs are paid by the unsuccessful party. A self represented party is generally entitled only to their disbursements (filing fees etc.)

Other orders

You can also ask the court to make “such further orders as the Court considers appropriate.”

Affidavits

  • Your Application should list the Affidavits you will rely on to support your application. You should list these by the name of the person giving the affidavit (deponent) and the date the affidavit is sworn.
  • You do not have to file all of your affidavits at the time that you file your Application, although you should list that you expect to file an affidavit from that other person.
  • For example:
Affidavit of Derek Dawson to be filed.
  • If you are filing any affidavits after you have filed your application, you should file and serve these as soon as possible. You can ask for the leave of the court to file these on the day of your hearing if necessary.

Preparing an Affidavit

Chapter 11, Part 7 of the UCPR contains the formal rules for preparing an affidavit.

Serving the application documents

Once your Application is filed, you should serve it on the other party as soon as possible. Under the UCPR, material for an application needs to be served at least three business days before a hearing (Rule 28 UCPR).

For example, if a hearing is to be heard on a Friday, the material should be served by Monday.

The Court can give leave to rely on material that is provided less than three business days before the hearing (Rule 28(2)).

Ex parte applications

In some circumstances an application can be made ex-parte, which means that only the Applicant appears at hearing, and that the Respondent is not served with the application and does not appear at the hearing.

Ex Parte Applications are rare, they are usually brought in urgent situations. For example, when you are seeking a freezing or preservation order about property that is at serious risk of being destroyed or removed from Queensland before the court has a chance to make a final decision in the matter (Chapter 8 Part 2 of the UCPR).


Commencing court proceedings

Commencing court proceedings

This fact sheet should be used when you want to bring a claim for damages in the Magistrates, District or Supreme Courts.

There are a number of issues which you should consider before bringing a claim such as:

  • Has the relevant time limit or “limitation period” expired?
  • Are there alternative avenues for recovering damages, such as a letter of demand or mediation?
  • Do I have a legal “cause of action” that might entitle me to damages (just because you have a grievance, does not mean you will necessarily be entitled to damages)?

Starting proceedings in court claiming damages is a serious step. There may be serious cost consequences for you if your claim is not successful. There are a number of different sources of free legal advice (such as Legal Aid and community legal centres) that you should consult before you start a claim.

This fact sheet is designed to help you get started.

Before we get started

In this factsheet, “UCPR” means Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999.

The UCPR are the formal rules that set out how civil court claims must be conducted, from the first step to initiate proceedings right through to what to do after the court has made final orders after a trial. If you ever need to know what the next step is in your court proceedings, or how to complete a particular step, you can look it up in the UCPR.

Step 1: Select the court (and registry)

Once you have decided to bring a claim and confirmed that you have a valid cause of action, the first step is to decide in which court and in which registry to bring your claim.

You firstly need to ask – what result do I want?

The table below shows in which court you should bring a claim, based upon the amount of damages that you are claiming.

Amount of Damages Correct Court
$0 – $25,000.00 Your claim may be a Minor Civil Dispute and the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal may be able to hear your matter.
Up to $150,000.00 Magistrates Court
$150,001 – $750,000 District Court
$750,001 and above Supreme Court

In some cases, you will want the court to do something other than award compensation. You might want the court to make a declaration, to order specific performance of an agreement or to grant an injunction preventing a defendant from doing something. In such a case you must bring your claim in either the District or Supreme Courts.

Once you have decided which court you need to use, you will need to select the correct registry. Unfortunately, you cannot necessarily bring your claim in the registry that is most convenient to you. You must bring your claim in the registry where:

  • The defendant is located; or
  • Where the incident or contract giving rise to the claim occurred.

If your claim needs to be started in a registry that is outside Queensland, stop now! This factsheet is only relevant for claims commenced in Queensland.

It is important to be clear about in which court and which registry to start your claim. If you select the wrong court or the wrong registry, your claim may need to be transferred, which could be expensive for you.

Chapter 2, Part 6 of the UCPR has more information about selecting the correct court and registry.

Step 2: Drafting a Statement of Claim

For information on drafting a Form 16 statement of claim, see our Drafting a Statement of Claim – tips and examples factsheet.

Step 3: Filing and service

“Filing” a document means placing a copy of the document on the court file, which is held at the court registry. The contact details of each court registry are available on the Queensland Courts website.

Keep both your claim and your statement of claim together.

You will be required to pay a filing fee at the time of filing your claim, unless you apply for a fee waiver. Current filing fees are contained in the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (Fees) Regulation 2009, available on the Queensland legislation website.

You can file your claim:

  • In person: by taking 1 copy plus an additional copy for each defendant and one copy for you to the registry in person; or
  • By post: by sending the required number of copies of your claim, with the filing fee and a reply-paid self-addressed envelope, to the registry to be filed. If you are filing by post, the Court Registry accepts no responsibility for any documents being delayed or lost in the post. We recommend that you file your Claim and Statement of Claim in person.

The registry will stamp and retain one of the copies of your claim. This will be kept on the court file. The registry will also stamp the other copies and return them to you.

You must then serve a copy of the claim on each of the defendants personally – ordinary post is usually insufficient. If your claim is not served properly, you may not be entitled to proceed with the claim.

Different forms of service, and how to properly serve court documents, are dealt with our Serving court documents factsheet. Alternatively, you can read the formal rules about service by checking Chapter 4 of the UCPR.

You must serve your claim as soon as possible – if you wait too long, you may not be entitled to proceed with the claim. See our Time limits – calculating time factsheet for more information. Make sure you keep a copy of the claim for your own future reference.

If you need more information about how to complete a claim and statement of claim, please contact the Self Representation Service.

Checklist

Commencing proceedings:

  1. Do I have a cause of action? Please see our cause of action factsheet for more information.
  2. What are the elements of that cause of action?
  3. In which Court/Tribunal should I commence proceedings?
  4. In which District should I commence proceedings?

Filing and serving the statement of claim:

  1. Have I filed both my Claim and Statement of Claim at the appropriate court registry, either in person or by post? Note: You will be required to pay a filing at the time of your claim.
  2. Have I served a copy of the Claim and Statement of Claim on each of the defendants personally? Note: this should be done as soon as possible. You must serve your Claim within one year.

 


Deciding to commence legal action

Deciding to commence legal action

The following information may help you to decide whether you should start court proceedings. Ideally, you should always seek legal advice and assistance from a solicitor before commencing legal action.

Do you know what you want?

Before commencing legal action, it is important to identify what it is you want as a result of the legal proceedings. Is it compensation? Is it reinstatement of your job? Or is it simply an acknowledgement of fault and an apology? It is important to know this to determine, first, whether the court can in fact give you want you want and, second, whether what you want is worth the stress of going to court.

Do you have a cause of action?

It is not enough just to have a grievance. You must have a cause of action that is recognised by legislation or common law as giving rise to an entitlement to legal action. Negligence for example, is a cause of action. In common law, negligence has 3 elements to be proved – that another person owed you a duty of care, that the person breached their duty and the breach caused you damage. You cannot ask a court to hear a negligence claim if your claim does not satisfy all 3 elements. For example, the first two elements may be satisfied, but you may not have suffered any real damage (see our factsheet on Damages and loss).

Be aware that the court in which you raise your grievance must have power to deal with that grievance. Certain courts have the power to deal with certain causes of action. For example, negligence is a civil tort or wrong that courts exercising civil jurisdiction can hear. You cannot ask the Family Court to hear a negligence claim.

For more detailed information, see our Cause of action factsheet.

Do you have sufficient evidence?

You cannot just say what you think happened. You have to prove it; you have to produce evidence.

Evidence can be in the form of documents, sound and video recordings, written witness statements and oral statements made in court. Keep in mind that if a person gives evidence of an event, such as a car crash, then they normally have to have knowledge of that event first hand, that is, they personally saw the crash happen.

In addition, your evidence has to be believed. If you say one thing and the other party contradicts what you say, then the judge (or jury) has to decide which version he or she accepts. The judge will make the decision on the basis of considering all of the evidence and his or her assessment of the character of each witness. The solicitor or barrister for the other side will try to question the reliability or character of you and your witnesses and point out the negative aspects of your case.

For more detailed information about evidence see our Evidence and proof in civil proceedings factsheet.

Do you have a lawyer?

Legal action can be a complex and frustrating process. A lawyer can help you negotiate and understand this process and will give you the best chance of succeeding.

If you cannot afford a private lawyer, then some alternatives may be:

In exceptional circumstances you may be able to ask the court to allow another non-legally qualified person to represent you, or at least help you in court by sitting beside you, take notes and give advice. You would need to show the court why you cannot represent yourself, for example, unable to attend court because you are in prison, English is your second language or you are unable to afford a lawyer.

If you are representing yourself, LawRight’s Court and Tribunal Services may be able to help you. See the LawRight website under Services for more information.

Other factors to consider before commencing legal action

Going to court should be a carefully measured decision. Representing yourself in court is NOT easy. There are many risks involved, and you should be aware of the possible consequences:

  • It is expensive – if you lose you will likely be ordered to pay the legal costs of the winning party.
  • It is very difficult to know the likelihood of success before you start proceedings. Do not let feelings of anger, injustice or retribution fuel you into pursuing your case through the courts. Make sure you have a valid cause of action and sufficient evidence in support.
  • It is likely to be a long process.
  • It can have adverse effects on other parts of your life, such as your health, relationships and family.
  • Managing and presenting your own case requires compliance with the rules and practices of the court. Cases frequently revolve around the finer points of law or evidence, which can be difficult to understand and navigate.
  • It can be extremely stressful.

Alternatives to court proceedings

Before commencing legal action, have you:

  • Advised the other side of your complaint? It may be worthwhile writing to the other side, setting out your grievance, to give them an opportunity to put forward their point of view or even offer a solution out of court.
  • Made a complaint to the relevant regulatory body? Depending on the type of dispute, you may be able to access dispute resolution processes offered by various regulating authorities such as the Office of Fair Trading or the Health Quality and Complaints Commission
  • Tried mediation? The Department of Justice and Attorney-General provides mediation services which are generally free to the public and for a fee in relation to facilitations and workplace mediations. See their website or telephone 07 3728 7000 or 1800 017 288. See also LawRight’s fact sheet on Mediation – a short guide.

However, you need to be aware of any time limitations that apply to your case. If you do not commence legal action within the relevant time period, then it may be difficult or even impossible to have your matter heard. See our factsheet on Limitation periods for further information.


Standing and involvement in legal proceedings

Standing and involvement in legal proceedings

What is standing?

Standing is the legal ability for someone to commence or be involved in legal proceedings.

Do I need standing?

In order to appear in court or to take part in a proceeding, a person must have standing. If you do not have standing, you will not be able to commence or continue legal action.

Who has standing?

The test for standing is sometimes defined by relevant legislation.

However, if there is no legislation, the general rule in Australia is that for a person to have standing, their private rights and interests are (or will be) affected by the matter, or they have a "special interest" in the subject matter.

In most cases, standing will not be an issue. For example, in personal injury cases, the person who has suffered injury is entitled to bring an action. In a case of trespass to rented property, the tenant (not the landlord) has that right to sue as it is the tenant's right to possession of the property that is affected. A person whose private interests have been (or will be) adversely affected by an act or decision of a public body has standing to seek judicial review.

However, if you are seeking to enforce a public right, that is, a right conferred on the public at large, the issue of standing may be more difficult to determine and may be contested by the other party. For example, it may be difficult for you to commence action against a factory which is polluting a neighbourhood if you are not a member of that neighbourhood or directly affected by the pollution. In these cases, you need to show a "special interest" in the subject matter, that is, your interest in the subject matter of the action is beyond that of any other member of the public. For example, a community group representing the interests of the neighbourhood may be able to demonstrate special interest.

The courts have said that the rules of standing need to be applied flexibly and have been prepared to apply the "special interest" test liberally.

Determining questions of standing

Standing may either be determined as a preliminary issue in the court proceedings or as part of the judge's final determination of the merits of the case. When the court will determine standing will depend on the particular circumstances of the case - cost and convenience may favour standing being determined as a preliminary issue.

Other options

Litigation guardians

  • Where a person does not have the capacity to bring an action either because of mental or physical incapacity or because the person is a minor, the action may be brought on his or her behalf by a litigation guardian.
  • A litigation guardian may be appointed by the court or by the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

Attorney-General's Fiat

  • Where a person does not have standing to enforce a public right, they can request that the Attorney grant a fiat, or consent, that the action be brought in the Attorney-General's name.
  • See LawRight's factsheet on Attorney-General's Fiat for when this is granted.

Amicus curiae

  • A person may appear as an amicus curiae, or "friend of the court", where they can provide submissions on law or facts which the court would not otherwise receive.
  • A party to a proceeding may seek leave to have an amicus curiae appointed.
  • An amicus curiae is most likely to be appointed where a party is unwilling or unable to protect their own interests and where the case involves an important legal question for the general community or disadvantaged people.
  • Examples of people or bodies acting as amicus curiae include the Attorney-General, Human Rights Commissioners, advocacy groups and barristers and solicitors.

Intervener

  • Where a person or organisation is not a party to a proceeding but will either be bound by the decision or their legal interests will be substantially affected, they can apply to the court as an intervener.
  • The Judge or Magistrate has the discretion to determine whether or not to allow a person or organisation to intervene.
  • If successful, the intervener will become a party to the proceedings and will have all the rights and obligations of the original parties.

Class Actions or representative proceedings

  • Legal action may be commenced by one or more persons on behalf of themselves and others who have the same interest in the subject matter of the proceedings.
  • See LawRight's factsheet on Class actions for more information.

Cause of action

Cause of action

Not everyone who has suffered loss, damage or injury may claim against a person or organisation they believe is the cause of their harm – a cause of action is required.

What is a cause of action?

A cause of action is the technical legal name for the set of facts which give rise to a claim enforceable in court. It is a legally recognised wrong that creates the right to sue. Each cause of action consists of points the plaintiff must prove and all of these elements must be satisfied in order to take court action.

A cause of action may arise from either a law passed by the parliament (statute) or from the common law. The common law has evolved gradually over time, and is law made by judges when they give their judgment on a case brought before them. This process has led to the development of various causes of action which may be used to bring an action in the courts. Which court will hear your case depends on the type of cause of action.

A lawyer cannot help you in taking your case to court if you do not have a cause of action. The court cannot hear your dispute nor make a decision without a valid cause of action. If you decide to proceed to court without a valid cause of action, the court is likely to dismiss your claim and order you to pay costs.

Why do I need a cause of action?

There are public policy reasons for only allowing certain causes of action. People are always suffering loss or injury, but if everyone was allowed to sue anyone without having a proper cause of action, the courts would be clogged with hearing every case brought before them. This would mean that the people who do have a clear and justifiable case may not get the justice they deserve.

For these reasons, the legal system has evolved and formed sets of conditions to separate cases that do have a likely cause of action from those that do not.

Examples of causes of action

There are many specific causes of action. The following are examples of some common causes of action that may be taken to court.

  • If a person unjustifiably enters or remains on your property without your permission, even where no damage is done, you may have an action in trespass to land. This can range from someone squatting on your land, to someone dumping their rubbish on your lawn. If this is a one-off event such as a drunk person sleeping in your front lawn, the police can be called to remove the offender. However, if it is continued, you can seek an order (an injunction) from the court to stop the trespass and ask the court for damages.
  • If you have made a legally binding agreement with a person and they fail to do what you both agreed to, you may have an action against them for breach of contract. This could include when you hire a plumber to install new pipes but instead the plumber only changes the washers in the taps.
  • If a person is substantially and unreasonably interfering with the use of your land without physically interfering with it, you may have an action in private nuisance. This could include a neighbour flooding your land, a neighbour deliberately watching and recording you, or a neighbour who has regular, loud, late-night parties involving shouting and swearing. However, you must not be particularly susceptible to the interference and the interference must be substantial and unreasonable.
  • If a person directly, intentionally, unlawfully restrains you against your will preventing your escape, you may have an action for false imprisonment. This could include somebody locking you in a vehicle or an office and not allowing you to leave, or bullies cornering you in a room. However, false imprisonment does not apply to lawful police detention.
  • If a person or organisation causes you or your property harm unintentionally by not exercising proper care and skill, you may have a claim in negligence. The law of negligence is quite complex and broad, and may include an injury you suffer from a driver who is speeding, or a doctor who leaves a medical instrument in your body after an operation they perform on you.
  • If as a tenant you are asked to leave your rental property without proper reasons by your landlord, you may have a cause of action to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal under the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 (Qld). This may include the situation where after you asked the landlord to fix the broken oven they asked you to leave the property with no grounds for this request. The landlord cannot ask you to leave the property to retaliate against you for taking actions to enforce your legal rights.

What can I do if I have a valid cause of action?

Even if you seem to have a cause of action, this does not mean that you will automatically win the case or receive monetary or another form of compensation. There are many other factors which must be considered, but establishing a cause of action is the first step in going to court.

In order to successfully commence a legal action you must also have standing to appear before the court and evidence that the person accused of causing the harm did in fact cause the harm. Please see LawRight’s factsheets on Standing and involvement in legal proceedings and Evidence and Proof in Civil Proceedings for more information on these issues.

You should also ensure that you commence your matter in the appropriate court or tribunal. For further information see the Queensland Courts Website.


Setting a civil trial date

Setting a civil trial date

This factsheet sets out how to get a civil matter in the Supreme and District Courts set down for trial under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (UCPR).

Sending a request for trial date

  • Once all of the interlocutory steps are complete and the matter is ready for trial, either party can send the other a request for trial date (form 48).
  • If you consider the matter is ready for trial, you should complete your details on the request for trial date and then send the request to the other party to complete.
  • The other party must respond to the request within 21 days (rule 469), either by signing the request and sending it back to the other side, or by telling the other side why the matter is not ready for trial.

Bringing an application

If you do not receive any response within 21 days, or if the other party writes back that the matter is not ready for trial, you can apply for an order dispensing with the signature of the other party on the request for trial date under UCPR rule 469.

First, complete a form 9 application in which you seek an order that “Pursuant to rule 469 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 the signature of the [Plaintiff/Defendant] on the request for trial date be dispensed with.”

You should also file a form 46 affidavit, exhibiting the request for trial date, your letter to the other party and their response (if any).

Responding to a request for trial date

If you receive a request for trial date, and you don’t think the matter is ready for trial, you should write to the other party setting out in some detail what additional steps need to be taken, and give a time frame in which you expect that step to be completed.

Bear in mind that the court expects parties to act promptly to resolve their dispute.

Ready for trial

“Ready for trial” is defined in rule 467 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rule 1999. This means that:

  • Disclosure has been complied with;
  • Any orders requiring particulars, or the issuing and giving of interrogatories have been complied with;
  • All necessary steps are complete; and
  • All of the necessary witnesses will be available at trial

When you are completing a request for trial date, you should check the trial availability calendar on the Queensland Court Website

You will have to nominate dates when you are available to attend the trial.

Consequences of filing a request for trial date

Filing a request for trial date has important consequences. It means that the leave of the court is required before either party can take a step in the proceedings, such as bringing an application or amending a document.

Supreme Court procedure

The Supreme Court procedure for setting trial dates in Brisbane is contained in a Practice Direction 9/2010(PDF 45KB)

Trial dates are allocated to cases that:

  1. are on “the trial list” either because the parties have filed a request for trial date; or
  2. a judge has placed on the trial list.

If the matter is placed on the trial list and you have not yet filed a request for trial date, you will have to file a Form 48 listing the dates that you are (and are not) available for trial.

You will be notified by the court when a trial date has been set down.

District Court procedure

In the District Court once both of the parties have signed the request for trial date and the request has been filed in the court registry the matter will be placed on the “callover” list by the court registry staff. The callover list is a list of matters that are waiting to be allocated a trial date.

The court will then set down a date for a callover, that is, a court hearing in which matters are allocated trial dates according to the court’s availability calendar. You will be able to attend the callover in case you need to tell the court about dates you are unavailable.

It is important to remember that a trial date will not be set down as soon as the request for trial date is filed – you need to wait until after the callover has occurred.


Court etiquette

Court etiquette

This fact sheet provides basic information on what to expect and how to behave when you go to court.

Entering the court

Make sure you arrive before your scheduled hearing time. If the judge is already in the court when you enter, stop and nod respectfully to the judge from the doorway of the court before proceeding to your seat.

If you are representing yourself, you should sit at the table in the centre of the courtroom facing the judge. This table is called the bar table. If the other party in your case is represented by a lawyer, you will usually sit on the left hand side of the bar table (as you walk into the court). If both parties do not have lawyers and you are the person bringing the legal action you should sit on the right. If you are defending the legal action you should sit on the left.

Remember that there may be other matters being heard the same day as yours, and you should wait for your matter to be called before moving to the bar table. While you are waiting, you can sit in the public seating area at the back of the court room.

Court layout

There will often be a number of court officials in the courtroom. For more information about who they are and where they sit, take a virtual tour:

Speaking to the judge

You must stand when the judge enters the courtroom.

You must also stand when the judge is speaking to you, or when you are speaking. If you are unable to stand because of a disability, you should explain this to the court (unless, of course, your disability is self-evident). At all other times you should remain seated and quiet. You address a judge as ‘your Honour’ and you should speak to them in a courteous manner. The judge may ask you questions at any point during the hearing – you should respond to these questions accurately, and as briefly, as possible.

You should not attempt to contact the judge directly at any stage outside of court. Any discussions you wish to have with the judge must occur in the courtroom.

How to dress

Court proceedings are formal occasions. While it is not strictly necessary to wear a suit, you should dress as neatly as you possibly can. Thongs and singlets must not be worn.

You should remove your sunglasses and/or hat before entering the court.

General rules

Going to court can sometimes be a frustrating process. However, it is important to be polite and courteous to court staff and the other party at all times.

Turn off your mobile phone. Do not simply switch it to silent

Note also that food and drink are not permitted inside the courtroom. There will generally be a jug of water provided for parties at the bar table.

Tape recorders and cameras may not be used in the court. You may be asked to remove any such items from the courtroom.

Accessibility

The courts are all wheel chair accessible. A number of other provisions have also been made to make access easier for persons with disabilities. Should you have any queries you should contact the registry of the court you are going to.

If you come from a non-English speaking background, you may be allowed to have a translator in the court room with you. This should be arranged before the hearing, not on the day. A list of accredited translators is available through the National Accreditation Authority for Translators and Interpreters Ltd. You should be aware that these translators are likely to charge a fee. You should also contact the registry of the court you are going to because they might be able to help you to organise an interpreter.

Go along and observe

The best way to determine how you should behave in a court room is to go along and watch a hearing or trial prior to the commencement of your own proceedings.

Most court hearings are open to members of the public. You can find a list of the hearings happening each day on the website of the court hearing your case. When watching another trial or hearing you should sit in the public gallery located at the back of the court room. You should still follow the same rules of etiquette as outlined above.

For more detailed information about going to court, please see:


Evidence and proof in civil proceedings

Evidence and proof in civil proceedings

To successfully pursue your case in court it is necessary to have evidence to back up your claim. You can’t just think you have a case, you must be able to prove it. Evidence can take several forms such as documents, sound and video recordings and witness statements (written statements about what the witness saw or heard). Evidence can also be given through oral statements (testimony) made at court by witnesses. There are a number of rules of evidence which have been established to ensure fairness in the trial process and to ensure that the best evidence is admitted.

In Queensland, the rules of evidence are governed by the Evidence Act 1977 (Qld). You should also have regard to any procedural rules under the Uniform Civil Procedure Act 1999 (Qld).

The facts in issue

Evidence is used to prove the “facts in issue” in a court proceeding. The facts in issue are the things you will need to prove in order for your case to succeed.

This will depend upon the cause of action or legal basis which entitles you to commence legal proceedings. For example:

In a case of negligence, a person must show that the other party owed them a duty of care, that this duty was breached and that the person suffered damage as a result.

A person claiming breach of contract must first show the existence of a contract, namely:

  • That there was an agreement between the parties,
  • That the parties intended to create a legal relationship and;
  • That consideration (that is, something of value) was provided as part of the bargain.

Admissibility and relevance

Evidence will only be admissible (allowed into court) if it is relevant. Evidence will be relevant where its existence tends to indicate that one of the facts in issue is more or less likely. Basically, the court will ask whether the evidence you are trying to introduce would help to decide the issue(s) before it. For example, in proving a breach of duty in a negligence claim, evidence about current financial hardship is unlikely to be relevant.

Evidence can either be:

  • directly relevant, where it includes an observation, perception or description of a fact in issue; or
  • circumstantially relevant, where the Judge or jury can use it to draw an inference which goes towards proving a fact in issue. Things like a person’s past habits or the existence of a motive can often be used as circumstantial evidence.

Circumstantial evidence can sometimes be very persuasive. For example, in a case of personal injury arising out of a machinery malfunction, the fact that an employer had been seen inspecting the machine the previous day might be used by a court to infer that they were aware that it was not working properly.

Exclusion of evidence (“exclusionary rules”)

While generally speaking, evidence that is relevant will be admissible, there are a number of exclusionary rules that may prevent evidence (however relevant) from being admitted by a court. If a judge decides in their discretion that the evidence is outside the rules, it will be held to be inadmissible and cannot be relied upon to prove the fact in issue. Whether one of these exclusionary rules applies in your case will be decided by the judge. If the trial involves a jury, they will be sent from the court to allow the matter to be determined in their absence.

Hearsay

Probably the most important of the exclusionary rules is known as the rule against hearsay.

Evidence that amounts to hearsay will not be admitted. Basically, this means that a person (person A) cannot give evidence of something another person (person B) said in an effort to prove that what was said by that person (person B) was true. For example, if Jeremy tells Robert that he had seen a third person, Susan, stab someone the previous day, Robert would not, as a general rule, be able to give evidence of Jeremy’s statement at Susan’s trial. Jeremy himself would have to be called to give the evidence of what he saw.

The hearsay rule applies not only to verbal statements, but also the contents of documents and non-verbal communication.

There are also several exceptions to the general rule. A statement, for example, which is made at the same time as the central event, will not be subject to the rule. For example if Robert had heard the victim yell ‘no Susan!’ while they were being stabbed, Robert would be able to give evidence of this fact.

The rule against hearsay will also not apply to statements which amount to a confession or admission. Accordingly, if Susan confessed her guilt to Jeremy, he would be able to give evidence of this confession, even though he did not see her do the stabbing.

There are several other exceptions to the rule against hearsay. Some of these are specific to information contained in documents. For further information on these exceptions consult the Evidence Act 1977 (Qld). There are also many textbooks written on evidence law that may be of use. You should check the Supreme Court Library Catalogue for these.

Opinion & expert evidence

As stated above, when a person gives evidence it must normally be a direct account of what he/she actually saw or heard. A person’s interpretation or opinion will not usually be admitted as evidence.

There are some exceptions to this general position. Firstly, a person’s opinion will be admissible where it relates to a matter within a person’s usual experience. For example, a witness will ordinarily be able to give evidence in relation to the time an event occurred, the weather or the general state or condition of an object.

Secondly, a person may give evidence of their opinion where they are an expert on a matter which falls outside the range of an ordinary person’s experience. Expert evidence may include the testimony of doctors, scientists or other specialised professionals. If your matter is a civil trial, you will be free to call expert witnesses as you see fit. It is important, however, to make sure that the witness you select has appropriate qualifications in the area of interest. If they do not, the judge may refuse to hear their evidence or disregard it.

Burden and standard of proof

Generally speaking, the person who brings an action is said to bear the “onus” or “burden of proof”. Accordingly, if you are the plaintiff (the person who commences the proceedings) it will be up to you to introduce evidence that supports your case. If you fail to do so, the case will be lost.

For a person to succeed in a court case, they must introduce evidence which is sufficiently persuasive: it is not enough simply to have more evidence than the other party. The level of evidence required in a particular case is known as the ‘standard of proof’.

In civil cases, the required standard of proof is known as the “balance of probabilities”. In simple terms, the balance of probabilities will be met if you can successfully establish that the claim you are making is more probable than not.

This can be contrasted with the standard of proof in criminal cases, which is “beyond reasonable doubt”. This means that the prosecution must bring evidence of such a standard that there would be no reasonable doubt in the mind of a reasonable person that the accused is guilty.

Presenting your evidence

There are many different types of evidence that can be used in a court case. Whatever form your evidence takes, it will need to be introduced by a witness. A witness is, essentially, someone who gives evidence in court. A witness may be called upon for a number of reasons – they may be asked to describe something they heard or saw or they will simply be required to verify that a particular document is authentic.

A witness can introduce evidence either orally in court, or by providing a written statement called an affidavit or statutory declaration which can annex documentary evidence. However, even if a witness prepares an affidavit, the other party may still require them to appear in court if they wish to cross examine them. This will be likely if the evidence is particularly significant or contentious.

For example, say you have a photograph of tyre marks on a road which you want to use to prove that the driver involved in an accident with you was negligent. To ensure fairness, it has to be proved where and when the photograph was taken to ensure that it relates to the particular collision and was not concocted. You could do this by calling as a witness the person who took the photograph, who would stand up in court and swear on oath the circumstances of taking the photograph. He or she would then be cross-examined by the other party. To make the evidence stronger, you may wish to call an expert in traffic accidents who could testify that the tyre marks show the speed of the vehicle or otherwise point to negligent driving. For the best evidence, you may also need to call an independent witness who can testify that they saw the driver driving erratically at the time of the accident.

Written or documentary evidence – disclosure

Any relevant written or documentary evidence in the form of reports, photos or witness statements will normally be provided to the other side before the hearing. The time for providing this evidence will usually be ordered by the court. The process in which each party is required to make any relevant documents it has in its possession available to the other party is called “disclosure”.

In certain circumstances, you can also compel non-parties to provide all documents relevant to the proceedings by issuing a Notice of Non-Party Disclosure.

Witness testimonies

Generally speaking, you are able to have anyone you wish appear as a witness in a court proceeding. You are also free to determine the order in which these witnesses appear. In calling witnesses, however, you will need to bear in mind the requirement that any evidence they present must be relevant. You should also note the possibility that certain evidence cannot be presented on account of various exclusionary rules discussed above.

All witnesses you intend to rely upon to give evidence should be served with a court document known as a subpoena. A subpoena compels the person named in the subpoena to appear in court. This document must be filed in the court registry before you give it to your proposed witness. If a person fails to comply with a subpoena they may be held in contempt of court (an offence for which they could be imprisoned).

You may also need to give each witness you call some conduct money to ensure they have sufficient funds to travel to court and appear in court when required.

Things to remember

In order to prove your case, your evidence has to be believed. If you say one thing and the other party contradicts what you say, then the judge (or jury) has to decide which version he or she accepts. The judge will make the decision on the basis of all of the evidence and his or her assessment of the character of each witness. The solicitor or barrister for the other side will try to question the reliability or character of you and your witnesses and point out the negative aspects of your case.

Judges are experienced in knowing what can and cannot be included in evidence. If the judge stops you from giving certain evidence, the judge is not trying to prevent you from making out your case, but rather letting you know that what you are saying will not help your case and it would be unfair to the other party to allow that evidence. The judge would make a similar decision if the other party was trying to use such evidence. You have the right to argue your points, but at the same time it is important to listen to the judge. The judge knows the rules and the law and must ensure that both sides are treated fairly.

Why not observe a court case?

You may find that the best way to get to grips with the rules of evidence in a court is by observing them in practice. This will allow you to see how a barrister or solicitor questions a witness and give you an excellent insight into court processes generally.

Most court hearings are open to members of the public. You can find out where and when court hearings will be occurring by checking the daily law-lists. The court schedule for any given day will be made available on this website by 6pm the previous evening.


Disclaimer

The information in this resource is for general information purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice. If you need legal advice, please contact LawRight or another lawyer. LawRight can only give advice to people who are eligible for our services.


Damages and loss

Damages and loss

Damages is a sum of money which is awarded by the courts for the purpose of replacing the monetary value of property or rights which have been lost or damaged, or to cover expenses, loss, pain and suffering relating to a victim’s injury or death.

Damages is a form of compensation. Compensation is a broader concept which encompasses, for example, money awarded under statutory schemes. On the other hand, damages are usually ordered by the court in actions for breach of contract or in tort (that is, a wrong or breach of duty).

Damages in contract

A contract is an agreement between two or more parties; either individuals or companies. If one party does not follow their part of the contract, then they may be liable to pay damages to the other. The aim of damages in contract law is to place the innocent party in the position which he or she would have been in if the contract had been followed. Damages in contract law will often be liquidated damages, that is, the amount of loss is capable of being calculated with reference to the contract.

Damages in tort

A tort is a civil wrong done by one party to another. An example of a tort is Defamation, where one person makes false comments or statements about another person (see our Defamation factsheets: Defamation – publications before 1 July 2021 & Defamation – publications from 1 July 2021). In this instance, money will be awarded to the second person to compensate them for the harm done to their reputation. As in contract, damages in tort are awarded to place the plaintiff in the position in which he or she would have been had the tort not been committed. A claim in tort gives rise to unliquidated damages; the worth of the damage can only be estimated, not calculated exactly.

Proof of loss and damage

In order to be awarded damages, the claimant (the person bringing the claim) will need to prove that he or she has suffered loss or damage as a result of the breach of contract or the wrong committed by the defendant. This means that the claimant will have to prove to a judge (or jury) that what they claim happened actually did happen. Documentation such as medical bills and receipts will be helpful in proving the claimant’s case.

Loss

Loss is damage, detriment, or suffering flowing from the act or omission of another. It is once this loss occurs that an action for damages or compensation can be brought. A common example of loss is that arising in personal injury cases. If you have suffered an injury that prevents you from working, then you may have suffered a loss of income. If you win your case and prove that you have not received income for a certain time period, then you will be entitled to compensation for your loss.

Injury

Injury can mean physical or mental damage to a person. This type of injury can include the aggravation, acceleration or recurrence of a pre-existing injury, prenatal injury, psychological or psychiatric injury, damage to crutches or aids of a similar nature, nervous shock, death resulting from injuries and disease. In the case of mental injury, the injury must be serious enough to amount to an identifiable psychiatric injury– merely being upset will not be enough to have a claim for damages.

Injury can also mean interference with a legal right, which will often be considered as having a monetary value, but does not require proof of damage. An example of this could be trespass to land, where the trespasser does not otherwise cause any damage.

Injury can also mean physical damage to goods or property.

Types of unliquidated damages

Nominal damages

This is where a court will award the claimant damages of an insignificant amount in a situation where a claimant has not suffered a loss but is still entitled to win the case. An example is the case of Constantine v Imperial Hotels [1944] KB 693, where the plaintiffs were refused accommodation in a hotel. The defendants had committed a tort by breaching their duty as an innkeeper to provide accommodation to paying guests. However, as the claimants could show no actual loss, they were awarded nominal damages of £5.

Contemptuous damages

This is where a court awards a very small amount of damages to indicate the court’s disapproval of the court action having been brought at all. This might be relevant in a Defamation action, where the court considers that the person bringing the action already has a poor reputation, and that the false statement made about the person is unlikely to damage their reputation much further.

Special damages

In contract, special damages are for losses reasonably supposed to have been in the contemplation of both parties at the time they made the contract, as the probable result of the breach. For example, if one party knew that the other party would incur a fine if the contract was not completed on time, but still delayed the performance of the contract. In tort, special damages may include compensation for loss and expenditure actually suffered and incurred, for example, medical expenses and loss of income.

To be awarded this category of damages requires precise pleading and proof. This means that the claimant must ensure that they have strong arguments and strong evidence to back up the arguments. It would require exact details concerning, for example, the loss of earnings and medical expenses. These types of damages are most likely to be awarded in personal injury cases.

General damages

General damages are awarded where there has been a breach of a right which gives rise to an action without the need for proof of damage. For example, the tort of Defamation does not require any proof of actual loss to reputation, however, large amounts of money are routinely awarded for assumed injury to reputation.

Aggravated damages

These damages are awarded in cases where the tort is serious enough to justify the awarding of extra money to the claimant. Circumstances giving rise to these damages include improper conduct by the defendant, where the tort was committed in a manner particularly insulting and humiliating, and where significant injury to the claimant resulted, including suffering of an emotional or personal nature.

Exemplary damages

Exemplary damages are awarded in addition to general damages where the court wishes, in addition to compensating the claimant for their loss, to punish the defendant. For example, if a book is published which gives rise to an action for Defamation, then a court might award exemplary damages to balance out the profit made by the defendant in book sales.

Exemplary damages are rarely awarded by a court. That is because they are unrelated to any loss suffered by the claimant or to the effect of the tort upon the claimant. Instead, they are focused upon punishing the defendant. The same set of facts may give rise to both aggravated and exemplary damages.

Parasitic damages

Where an interest has been infringed which is separate to the tort being contested, parasitic damages may be awarded. For example, damages for loss of reputation have been awarded where the tort of false imprisonment has been proven.


Disclaimer

The information in this resource is for general information purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice. If you need legal advice, please contact LawRight or another lawyer. LawRight can only give advice to people who are eligible for our services.


Personal injuries

Personal injuries

Personal injury can relate to a physical or psychological harm or injury. A number of different laws cover personal injuries depending on whether the injury occurred at a workplace, in a motor vehicle accident or was caused by an act of crime.

LawRight factsheets about personal injuries

This factsheet outlines the general law of personal injury claims set out under the Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 (Qld) (PIPA) and the Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld) (CLA).

It does not consider claims for personal injuries which:

Time limits

Claims for damages for personal injuries must be commenced within three years of the cause of action arising. In most personal injury cases, this means three years from the date the injuries were sustained. The three year limitation period may be extended in certain specified circumstances.

If you are considering making a personal injuries claim, you should contact a private solicitor who can assist you on a speculative (no win, no fee) basis without delay.

Pre-Court procedures

Before you can start proceedings for a personal injury claim in court, you must comply with the pre-court procedures in PIPA.

Notice of a claim

Firstly, you must notify the person who caused your injury (the ‘respondent’) of your intention to make a claim. Notice is given in two parts, Part 1 and Part 2, on prescribed forms. You can obtain the forms from the Department of Justice website, located here.

The time limit for delivering a Part 1 Notice to a respondent is the earlier of:

  • 9 months from the date you sustained the injury, or
  • 1 month from the date you first instructed a lawyer (other than a lawyer working at a community legal centre).

A Part 1 Notice requires: a description of the incident which led to your injury, details of any medical treatment received and any relevant pre-existing medical conditions or injuries, and information about the circumstances surrounding the incident and who you say caused the incident. A medical certificate relating to the injuries and, if appropriate, a diagram of the scene of the incident, must be attached to the Part 1 Notice.

Notice of a claim arising out of a “medical incident”

If your claim arises out of a “medical incident”, you must give an initial notice of your claim to the respondent before providing a Part 1 Notice.

There is no prescribed form for the initial notice, however, section 9A(3) of PIPA sets out the information required, including: your details, a description of the medical services which you allege gave rise to your injury and the date and place that the medical services were provided.

The Part 1 Notice must then be provided to the respondent within one year from the date you receive their response to the initial notice. A copy of any advice or warnings provided to you by the health care provider must also be attached to the Part 1 Notice. You must include a written report from a medical specialist, competent to assess the incident alleged to have given rise to your injury.

After the respondent has received your Part 1 Notice

Once you provide a Part 1 Notice to the respondent, the respondent has one month to let you know whether they are the proper respondent and whether they accept your Part 1 Notice as complying with PIPA.

If the respondent disputes that they are a proper respondent to your claim, they must give you information to enable you to identify the appropriate respondent. If the respondent disputes that your Part 1 Notice complies with PIPA, they must give you written notice of the defects, after which, you will have one month to rectify those defects.

If the respondent does not respond to your Part 1 Notice within one month, they are presumed to have accepted the notice.

A Part 2 Notice must then be given to the respondent within two months of the earlier of:

  • The date the respondent replies to your Part 1 Notice (whether or not the respondent accepts that they are the proper respondent to your claim);
or
  • The date the respondent is presumed to have accepted your Part 1 Notice.

You must include copies of any other documents relevant to your injury, economic loss, medical treatment or rehabilitation that is in your possession with the Part 2 Notice.

Failure to comply with the pre-court procedures within time

If you fail to provide your Part 1 and/or Part 2 Notice within the prescribed time limit, you must provide a reasonable excuse for your delay. In considering whether an excuse is reasonable, the court will consider, among other things, the extent and nature of your injuries, whether you have a reasonably sustainable cause of action, the length of, and reasons for, the delay.

If you are unable to provide a reasonable excuse for your delay, you may be prevented from proceeding further with your claim. However, if you are within the three year limitation period, you may still be able to pursue your claim by applying to the court for leave to commence proceedings even though you haven’t complied with pre-court procedures or by seeking the agreement of the other side to allow you an extension of time to comply with the pre-court procedures.

Compulsory conference

Before you can start court proceedings in relation to your injury, you must have a conference with the respondent or get the respondent’s agreement that a conference is not appropriate. The purpose of the conference is to try to resolve your claim with the respondent without the need to go to court. Either party can request that a conference take place any time after 6 months from the date you gave the respondent a compliant Part 1 Notice.

Before a compulsory conference can be held you and the respondent must have disclosed (given to the other party) any documents relevant to your claim and have signed a certificate of readiness. Each party must have completed their preparation work, and have all of their evidence, together with the appropriate notices to the Health Insurance Commission and Centrelink in place, in order to participate in a conference.

If the matter is still not settled after the compulsory conference, mandatory final offers can be sought.

Mandatory final offers

Mandatory final offers must be exchanged if you do not reach an agreement with the respondent at the compulsory conference. These are the final offers you and the respondent will make in an attempt to settle the matter out of court. The court must, if relevant, have regard to the mandatory final offers in making a decision about costs (see LawRight factsheet ‘Costs Orders‘ ). If a mandatory final offer is not accepted, then the PIPA requirements are complete and a party is free to commence legal action in the courts.

Court proceedings

Court proceedings are to be commenced within 60 days of a compulsory conference. Once court proceedings have been commenced, a different set of deadlines apply, as governed by the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld).

Establishing liability

In order to succeed in a negligence action, the following must be shown:

  1. The defendant owed the plaintiff a duty of care:
    A defendant has a duty of care when there is an obligation on them to care for the plaintiff in circumstances where they can foresee injury or damage could result from their conduct.
  2. The defendant breached their duty of care:
    A breach of duty occurs when the defendant fails to do what a reasonable person would have done in the same circumstances.
  3. The injury was suffered as a result of the breach of duty:
    The injury or loss must be a direct result of the defendant’s failure to fulfill their responsibility and the injury must not be too remote.

Calculation of damages

General damages

‘Damages’ refers to the amount of money you ask for to compensate you for your injuries. Below is some information specifically related to personal injury proceedings. For more general information about damages see the LawRight factsheet ‘Damages and Loss‘ .

General damages refers to:

  • pain and suffering
  • loss of amenities of life
  • loss of expectation of life
  • disfigurement

The amount in general damages awarded depends upon the seriousness of the injury and is capped by law at $250,000.

In calculating general damages, the court will assign an injury value from 0 (negligible injury) to 100 (the most serious injury). In order to assess the injury, the court is guided by rules prescribed under the Civil Liability Regulation 2025 (Qld) and injury values attributed to similar injuries in prior proceedings.

Other types of damages

  • Damages for loss of earnings or earning capacity:
    The maximum amount of money available for loss of earnings is approximately three times the average weekly earnings.
  • Damages for gratuitous services:
    Damages for gratuitous services required by the injured party are available if the services are necessary, the need for the services arises solely out of the injury, the services are provided at least 6 hours per week and the services are required for at least 6 months.
  • Exemplary, punitive or aggravated damages:
    Exemplary, punitive or aggravated damages may be awarded in limited cases in which the act that caused the injury was an unlawful act done with intent to cause personal injury, or an unlawful sexual assault or other unlawful sexual misconduct.

If you are awarded damages you may enter a structured settlement. This is an agreement for the payment of damages in periodic payments rather than a lump sum.

Notice to minimise damages

An injured person has a duty to minimise their loss and damage by taking reasonable steps to mitigate damage. They may be served a notice suggesting certain steps that should be taken to minimise loss such as for the injured person to undergo specific rehabilitation or medical treatment. Failure to follow the suggestions may result in damages being reduced.

Getting legal help

Before deciding to engage a solicitor for a personal injury action, you should be clear about some basic information. Please refer to Legal Aid Queensland’s website, Personal Injury. This site outlines how you can find a lawyer to assist you and some important questions you should ask your lawyer before commencing proceedings.

In small claims of <$50,000, it can be difficult to find a solicitor who will act on a ‘no win, no fee’ basis. In such a case, you may be able to make a claim yourself. The Suncoast Community Legal Service has created a useful self-help guide which can be completed online or downloaded.


Disclaimer

The information in this resource is for general information purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice. If you need legal advice, please contact LawRight or another lawyer. LawRight can only give advice to people who are eligible for our services.